"SO DARK THE WITH OF MAN!"
( DAN BROWN, THE DA VINCI CODE )
One thing we would like to invite you to the ref letters are really just that, on Sunday morning, all the people are grouped under a balcony in St. Peter's Square in Rome to venerate the person who is considered the sole representative of Christ on Earth? No, I do not find it all right. Beyond what may be the concept of right or wrong, all relative from person to person, I believe that this is not right for 'Humanity . What you see
under the balcony of the Pope, what you see going to church on Sundays, you see that look bad, only because you have the courage to be free, and people who still do not understand who is likely to have the helm of their lives. They are, yes, and do not realize it. So I ask: is it good to let things do their course, because all this will end sooner or later and will fall by itself, as pure fiction, or is it good act, do something, to act as a counterbalance to this 'altar robes and hats, which now clings to Latin, to try to establish a sacred ahiloro-who-has had its day ??!!??
I was almost convinced that we must act in their own small, intimate life of each individual, as long as they did not awaken the consciousness and the man had not taken full control of the self, and now I doubt arises, that something has to move and that it takes a real movement, all those who are against this state of affairs.
We have only one thing, without them, or, more appropriately, could provide them with less certainty, making them unattractive, at first glance:
we do not have an absolute truth.
We have one truth, systematized according to forms and ceremonies and dresses, we can unite and make credible as a single movement. Each of us, who left the pavement fixed by the masses, has decided to pursue his own which, although
to the unique inner half of the growth, the Ascension, the only truth-this-is that all come from a single source and that we are the Source and the Source is Love and therefore we love, well, aside from all this is a different path for each, with different experiences, never be summed up in one and the same belief. We have no dogmas,
not want limits, aware that the limits exist, if we ourselves create them in reality at stake. This is where the dissonance may arise: the mass that we seek to awaken suddenly would have to believe or something already outlined, which already offers pre-packaged good Christian living as poor and suffering, happy to suffer, confident that this will lead him straight into his victim kingdom of heaven, of course, after death;
or a bunch of people who heretically proposes the collapse of the system-the church, together with fear of Judgement, Death, Women, Land of plenty of sex.
HERETICS : D makes me laugh! We would be us against a whole state, which is much larger than the Vatican .. piloted this consciousness is inherent in many, many more people than we think.
Today, September 9, 2007 (yesterday, actually), Beppe Grillo has made his Fuck Day in Bologna. And if you organize a Fuck Day the Vatican??
I have my doubts about not just about the glue "credibility", as above, but also some other factor.
First, I am afraid that people would join this kind of movement, sooner or later take leave from " fever leader " , whereby a leader does not mean someone is inevitable-as-you drive a project of this type, but someone who you think you represent a kind of guru, enlightened master more than the others, which refer, someone, in short, that would replace the figure, just a few lines ago, I was widely discredited ...
no hierarchy, no institutionalization, no doctrine.
No religion .. or something of all. This should be a focal point of the whole matter. If a movement is born, it must do so starting from these assumptions, because a church, such as that perhaps Jesus really meant, is based not on the walls of a building and on the figure of one man and a council of old hypocrites around which revolve hundreds and hundreds of lives in chains, but is built on the shoulders of each of us, as the only responsible for our walk, Masters of ourselves, each representing a part unfailing source of God-Goddess, of which we are emanations.
Another concern that I am not convinced, and by introducing an anti- tuttoquellochevedeteingiro could be seen as someone to go to war, that pope or cardinal is. Could fuel hatred, fanaticism others, create something uncontrolled, which would have the opposite effect to that intended: not only discredit all of us who toil in the street trying to get us into the minds and hearts of men, but followed, in a heterogenesis of view, to "sanctify" the figure even more the pope, thereby symbol of the martyr who suffers and is persecuted by a world that, quite far from the values \u200b\u200bthat Christ taught us dying (and not living !!!!!), becomes the champion of the masses, rather than in their yoked.
The point here is that you are not going to go to war to anyone, nor to go against "a specific person, if not representative because it is something that has ceased to exist.
The intentions and actions must be peaceful ,
placing sole purpose is the elevation of consciousness, for the good of all without any profit.
teach the Faith: not blind faith in something you can not ask, but confidence in themselves and in the god-goddess who we are.
To save the world from sin, com trip over to teach them that they are not sinners !
's just relying on some essential conditions that we can start thinking about singing something different from the usual "angelus" Sunday ... something that stirs their hearts, rekindle their spark divine!
I think that we should not watch more, I'm feeling too much, too much crap come from mouths that say they are inspired by God! Not enough to speak of Love and Peace Middle East, not just make the call for the release of people who have been kidnapped or pray and for the preservation of the planet! It is not enough, then if we hear of women who are not eligible to serve the mass! If we listen to sermons in which he warns you to be afraid of death and the Last Judgement good, or to consider poverty as an indispensable condition for the Christian, or even to consider sex as something
of vile and despicable, if not the end of the play, rather than as a means of communion between the sacred souls and bodies, as it should be! Chastity, poverty, fear .. fear .. fear in another person that places be someone who is just looking out of control! Anyone who promises a reward in an otherworldly realm, blackmail while you are alive by means which ensure the control of your soul and your mind is a slave, a hypocrite, because he was the first to know what that tells you not is what God wants but what he wants. 
God has left free .. and not to judge you at the end of the game, would not be "fair" .. God has released because HAS ' left free to be something wonderful on the Earth plane. It will be wonderful, whatever you decide to do.
With Passion ,
bambinadallospazio PS: Of course I look comments and suggestions to clarify the doubts I have and also to hear how you think about it!
